It was dubbed the "darkest hour" in postwar German media history. DW takes a look back at the Gladbeck hostage drama and how coverage of the event 25 years ago shattered the nation and redefined the rules of reporting.
August 16, 1988: a hostage drama unfolds in the small Westphalian town of Gladbeck. Two robbers, Dieter Degowski and Hans-Jürgen Rösner, at the time 32 and 31, respectively, robbed a bank and fled with two hostages. Little did they know their crime would go down in German television history, for it was the first time ever that viewers would watch a criminal pursuit take place before their very eyes.
Journalists, who normally want to stand by and watch, this time were in the thick of the drama, even hindering police and conducting interviews with the hostage takers. The US periodical Newsweek referred to the episode as the "Hans and Dieter Show" - a true first for German media.
In pursuit of the best sound bite
By the end of the pursuit that saw Degowski and Rösner traverse pretty much all of Germany in a stolen bus, taking a total of 32 people hostage, photo journalists had all the time in the world to snap shots of the bus and the people inside.
Journalists fought for the best position from which to depict the events. Radio reporters let the hostage takers themselves give their take on how the situation developed, with one of the two gangsters saying at one point, "from here on I only want to speak through the media."
The German nation - or those with television or radio access - was able to follow the entire showdown live. A sense of excitement and fascination, horror and disbelief were palpable throughout the country.
Desire for pictures
Iconic photographs were taken of hostages being interviewed with guns held to their throats. One reporter even made his way into the getaway car to direct the hostage takers through the streets of Cologne - a city with which they were apparently unfamiliar.
That particular reporter faced harsh criticism for his actions after the affair, even facing allegations of complicity, but nevertheless he later became the editor-in-chief of Germany's most-read tabloid, Bild.
By the time the drama had reached its end, two hostages were dead (including one of the female hostages who had been photographed with a gun held to her throat) and a number of others traumatized.
Was the media partly responsible for the disaster? Media psychologist Jo Groebel, for one, argues that the journalists who covered the affair not only satisfied the hostage takers' desire for recognition and attention - they also "incited" the criminals to prove themselves in their brutal megalomania.
Critical distance in the smartphone era
Michael Konken, head of Germany's largest journalists union (DJV), refers to the Gladbacker drama as "the darkest hour of German journalism since the end of WWII." As a direct consequence, the national press council issued a number of reprimands and drew up tighter controls for the coverage of such affairs.
An ethical debate was also held in the media landscape itself, with several papers concluding that such coverage "should never happen again." Today, it is illegal for any media outlet to conduct interviews with hostage takers while the crime is taking place.
But has anything really changed? These rules seem at first glance almost impossible to control in our modern era of digital reporting and social media. Nowadays, videos on YouTube and photos taken by so-called civil reporters have blurred the distinction between eyewitnesses and professional journalists.
"It hasn't become any easier to make the right decisions in the pursuit of responsible journalism," Alexander Filipovic, professor for media ethics at the University of Münster, told DW.
"The Internet gives criminals all sorts of possibilities to get their message out there. In a way, the striving for public attention has become part of the crime itself." This represents an "extreme challenge" for journalists, notes Filipovic, adding that the ability to "classify and assess" events is of utmost importance.
This ability, in Filipovic's eyes, is based on "sound research, accuracy, and respecting the protection of victims and the accused."
Love letters from prison
In the case of Dieter Degowski, who remains incarcerated 25 years on, it appears many media outlets are still struggling with meeting these requirements. Since 2002, Degowski has been allowed to leave custody four times. On one occasion, journalists flocked to the prisoner for interviews.
Ahead of the 25th anniversary of the Gladbecker hostage drama, the debate surrounding Degowski re-emerged, as he was eligible for parole. The court, however, decided that Degowski should remain behind bars.
And in the case of Rösner, who is also still in prison and is seen as the brains behind the crime, German media have been all but reserved in their attempts at obtaining coverage. Bild.de, the tabloid's Internet presence, recently published excerpts from the "love letters" Rösner wrote to his fiancé.
Several media outlets have apparently requested interviews from Rösner on the occasion of the 25th anniversary, and the only reason he won't be appearing before any cameras this time around is that the Justice Ministry rejected all requests.
"Rösner maintains to the present day that he wasn't responsible for any harm done," ministry press spokesman Peter Marchlewski told DW. Any interview would thus infringe upon the rights of his victims. The broadcasters that submitted the requests didn't seem to be bothered by this.
German employment has dipped marginally in the past four weeks. The Federal Employment Agency cited seasonal factors and said the labor market in general was still robust in Europe's power house.
The European Court of Human Rights has awarded Yukos shareholders 1.9 billion euros ($2.54 billion) in compensation. The now defunct oil company successfully argued that Russia unlawfully seized it in 2003.