Scotland: Choices and uncertainties
Yes or no? On September 18, Scotland votes on independence. A look at arguments on both sides - and the many unresolved issues.
Hope and trepidation
An independent Scotland would cause upheaval not only in Scotland, but there would be change in store for Britain, Europe, and NATO too.
In Scotland's hands
For supporters of an independent Scotland, there is no doubt at all: the country has nothing to lose. With the help of the income from the North Sea oil fields, the country could easily stand on its own two feet - while the British government won't like losing those black gold tax revenues.
Better together
Opponents argue that unity makes the country strong, and there is more common ground between Britain and Scotland than there are differences. They are also concerned about the economic consequences. The extent of oil and gas reserves left in Scotland's waters - a key referendum issue - is arguable.
Currency questions
Another unresolved issue is currency. The options: either Scotland keeps the pound, joins the eurozone - or it just might start its own currency.
Nuclear weapons-free zone
What would happen to Britain's Trident nuclear submarines currently stationed at the Faslane Naval Base northwest of Glasgow? Scotland appears widely opposed to the presence of nuclear weapons in the country.
Queen or no queen?
An independent Scotland could be a constitutional monarchy, and keep Queen Elizabeth II as its head of state, like Canada. But some Scots want a republic.
Citizenship and debt
Just days ahead of the referendum, many Scots are still undecided. A split raises a variety of thorny issues. How much of the UK's national debt would Scotland inherit? And would dual citizenship be permitted?
Members again
Automatic membership of the European Union isn't a given either. There is no precedent, and opinions vary ahead of the referendum. British experts say Edinburgh would actually have to re-apply for EU membership.