1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

NATO probe

November 1, 2009

A German magazine is reporting that a NATO probe into a deadly airstrike in Afghanistan that caused outrage in the region is more critical of the German commander who ordered it than the German army has admitted.

https://p.dw.com/p/KK9e
German colonel Georg Klein is pictured at the German base in Kunduz, Afghanistan
The airstrike was ordered by Colonel Klein and carried out by US fighter jetsImage: AP

The newsmagazine Der Spiegel said in an early release of its edition to be published on Monday that a NATO investigation into the September airstrike that killed dozens of Afghan civilians showed the German commander who ordered it broke military procedure.

The September 4 strike on two fuel trucks in the northeastern Kunduz province was the most deadly operation involving German troops since World War Two. The Afghan government said the airstrike killed 69 Taliban fighters and 30 civilians.

German forces said the bombing targeted the fuel tankers as they were hijacked by Taliban insurgents and represented a danger.

In the immediate aftermath, Berlin said around 50 militants were killed in the attack but that there were no civilian casualties. Witnesses, however, spoke of several civilian casualties, prompting critical reactions even from Germany's NATO allies.

The report said that German authorities have put pressure on NATO not to issue an outright condemnation of Colonel Georg Klein because it could lead to legal problems. This message was given to the NATO commander in Europe, Admiral James Stavridis, during a visit to Berlin on October 15.

Backing for decision

General Wolfgang Schneiderhan, general inspector of the German army, said on Thursday that according to the report, Colonel Klein, had acted correctly in ordering the strike.

Afghani people bury the victims of the NATO air strike in a mass grave near Kunduz, Afghanistan
Afghans are becoming increasingly angry over rising civilian casualtiesImage: AP

"In light of the results of the report, I have no reason to doubt that German soldiers acted in the correct military fashion, given their mandate from the United Nations and the difficult operational situation," Schneiderhan said.

He said the exact death toll in the attack could no longer be determined, adding that the report cited a range of between 17 and 142 casualties.

"The investigation is still under review and no other comment can be made at the moment," a Defense Ministry spokesman said when asked about the report in Der Spiegel.

Some EU condemnation

The attack, carried out by a US F-5 fighter jet, was condemned by several European foreign ministers.

Germany has maintained it was necessary to protect its troops from a possible suicide attack by Taliban fighters who had hijacked the trucks.

The Spiegel report said Colonel Klein broke standard operating procedure by ordering air support on the grounds that his troops had come into contact with the enemy, even though international forces were nowhere near the tankers.

A German soldier sitting atop of a tank watches the area around Faisabad Airport in Afghanistan
Germany has 4,200 troops troops in AfghanistanImage: AP

The magazine also said Klein refused to allow the aircraft to conduct a low-altitude sweep of the area before launching its payload, adding that overcast skies also raised doubts about the appropriateness of ordering a strike while relying on a single human information source and video alone.

The report cited a source familiar with the NATO report as saying it also addressed positive sides of Klein's leadership and that it could be used to either condemn or excuse him.

Germans remain highly skeptical of military operations more than 60 years after the defeat of the Nazis. It was only a decade ago that German troops participated in their first foreign combat mission since the war.

Opinion polls indicate a majority of Germans want the over 4,000 German troops deployed in Afghanistan as part of the six-year-old NATO mission to come home.

rb/AFP/Reuters
Editor: Kyle James