Failures at all levels undermining US spy agencies' crackdown on terror

Afghanistan operatives "starved" of information

Outside of the United States, intelligence agencies are not only suffering from inefficiency but also a lack of their raw material: information.

US troops on the ground are "starved" of accurate info

Intelligence officials on the ground in Afghanistan admitted that US operative were "so starved" of accurate on-the-ground intelligence "many say their jobs feel more like fortune telling." Major General Michael Flynn, the top NATO and US military intelligence chief in Afghanistan, even said that they were "clueless" and "no more than a fingernail deep in (their) understanding of the environment."

Richard Betts agrees: "The pool of Americans who actually really know these countries with enough inside expertise and bicultural sensitivity is very, very small," he said. "The result is significant reliance on foreign services or American immigrants which reduces the confidence the intelligence agencies may have in the reliability they get or which limits opportunities to exploit openings."

"Operatives in these regions don't have a lot of human input," said Giles Merritt. "They rely on electronic surveillance mostly. They lack people on the ground which can give them a clear picture of what is going on. It's very difficult in such a fragmented society like Afghanistan where you have tribal loyalties and regional warlords."

Major General Flynn has already called for radical structural changes to help an intelligence-gathering apparatus which "still finds itself unable to answer fundamental questions about the environment in which we operate and the people we are trying to protect and persuade."

Obama moves to shake up intelligence with reforms

Back in the US, President Obama seized the initiative and announced his intention to launch a set of ambitious reforms, including a revamp of the government's terrorist "watch-list" system which had omitted potential Christmas Day bomber Abdulmutallab from its no-fly list of people with suspected terrorist links.

Obama promised sweeping reforms for spy agencies

"I want our additional reviews completed this week. I want specific recommendations for corrective actions to fix what went wrong," Obama said. "I want those reforms implemented immediately so that this doesn't happen again and so that we can prevent future attacks."

"It is politically necessary and proper for the president to make a dramatic effort to fix the vulnerabilities revealed by the failures," said Betts. "The specific fixes are in many cases technical matters of coordinating information technologies and distribution mechanisms. More general needs, for example deep expertise on non-western societies, and the ability of agents to operate in denied areas, are harder to deal with and will require inventive investments in human capital for the long term - and such investments may not be popular with politicians looking for immediate solutions."

Specific intelligence targeting the way forward

Giles Merritt believes that change from all-encompassing security sweeps to specific threat assessment and suspect profiling would be a good place to start.

Airport security will get tougher - but will it get smarter?

"The big issue concerns whether profiling of suspects is politically acceptable," he said. "Politicians seem to shy away from profiling because it identifies people of specific nationality and religious beliefs and singles them out as potential terrorists. But this seems to be the best way to approach security. This even-handed approach where old ladies are strip-searched just isn't working and I think this Detroit incident is going to move the approach more toward profiling, and deeper sharing and analysis of intelligence."

"What needs to be done is a total rethink of security," Merritt added. "With airport security you need to take the collection of data, the profiling, and the monitoring out of the hands of poorly paid staff and into those of highly-trained professionals. Israel’s El Al has the best security record despite being the airline under the biggest threat because of the people they have carrying out their security.

"We also have to get over this political correctness that all passengers are the same," he said. "That's where we need a major rethink. You need to forget about the 98 percent of people who are never going to be a terrorist and then concentrate on the tiny amount of the remaining two percent who could be, applying advanced profiling and information sharing to identify potential threats."

Failures make news but successes save lives

Despite the furore over the recent intelligence blunders, Richard Betts is quick to point out that failures will always make bigger headlines than successes.

"In the weeks before the recent disasters, there were several arrests of plotters or suspects which received less publicity and which were virtually taken for granted by the public, yet which showed that the system was effectively interdicting actual or potential attacks," Betts said. "Successes sometimes are not publicized and at other times, even unknown. For example - if precautions cause a planned attack to be cancelled, we never know how successful the precautions were. Failures will inevitably get more attention - as they should - but do not in themselves necessarily discredit the whole system of counterintelligence and counterterrorism organization."

Author: Nick Amies

Editor: Rob Mudge